【精选特辑】203、吃海鲜=吃塑料?

Cora CI会议口译 2019-08-15

声音资源加载中...

中到英

音频分为两部分,前半段中文,后半段英文,中间有5秒停顿。本材料可用于脑记复述、笔记交传或进行同传,翻完之后可参考Cora的英语翻译。

难度:advanced

欢迎大家在留言区给出自己认为的难度。

时长:5'03"

正文开始于1'32"处,译文开始于6'40"处。

词汇

shard, exfoliater, stain, sythetic, nylon, strand, discharge, plankton, stool, linen

讲解
  • microplastics:微型塑料颗粒。指直径小于5毫米的塑料颗粒,来自塑料碎片、合成纤维,或是文中提到的个人护理用品中的塑料微珠。

  • the Great Lakes:北美五大湖。是世界最大的淡水湖群,总蓄水量约占全世界淡水湖总量的1/5。包括苏必利尔湖(Lake Superior)、密歇根湖(Lake Michigan)、休伦湖(Lake Huron)、伊利湖(Lake Erie)和安大略湖(Lake Ontario)。

    the Great Lakes

  • single-use plastic item:一次性塑料制品

  • sewage treatment plant:污水处理厂。污水处理工艺分三级:一级处理是物理处理,通过机械处理,分离并去除污水中所含的污染物;二级处理是生物化学处理,利用微生物将污染物降解和转化为污泥;三级处理是对污水的深度处理,以过滤吸附水中剩余的污染物。

  • (it all) adds up:积少成多。原文指即便一件化纤衣物掉不了多少毛,但穿化纤衣物的人多了,排放到海洋中的microplastics的总量依然惊人。

  • make one's way up the food chain:指微型塑料颗粒从浮游生物开始,顺着食物链最终进入人体,这个过程其实就是bioaccumulation,即生物富集。

  • synthetic fiber: 合成纤维。尼龙(Nylon)是世界上出现的第一种合成纤维,制成的衣物廉价而舒适。常见的合成纤维还包括涤纶(polyester)、腈纶(acrylic)等等。与天然纤维相比,合成纤维的原料是由人工合成方法制得的,生产不受自然条件的限制。

Disclaimer

本演讲仅用作口译练习素材,不代表Cora个人观点,更不是要耸人听闻,或是建议大家吃什么不吃什么。

事实上,在写这篇演讲的时候,为了保持结构完整,我本想加入人体囤积塑料的危害。但就我阅读的相关文章显示,目前研究尚处于初步阶段,并没有确凿证据支持塑料会对人体构成健康威胁。因此,这一部分被我省去了(并为翻译的上下文衔接造成了一定困难)。

但不管怎样,塑料垃圾对于海洋生态系统的威胁已是不争的事实。所以,在日常生活中尽量少用塑料制品依然是不错的建议。

错误
  • 植物纤维plant fiber,口误又说了一次natural fiber。

笔记

讲稿

We hear a lot on the news about single-use plastic items like plastic straws and shopping bags that are polluting the oceans. It’s true. But most of the plastic pieces in the oceans don’t look like that. They are actually small particles, smaller than 5 millimeters. They are what we call micro-plastics, and they are everywhere. The concentration is highest in the Great Lakes in North America, rivers in Britain, and the coastal beach on South Africa. Some of the micro-plastics are shards broken off larger items that we’ve mentioned before. Some of them are micro-beads developed for use in personal care. For example, there are micro-beads in exfoliators that are supposed to move our dead skin. And there are micro-beads in toothpastes to remove tooth stains. But most of the micro-plastics are actually micro-fibers. So why are there fibers in the oceans? 

 

Well, back in the 1940s, synthetic fabrics made from plastic, like nylon, became really popular among consumers because they are cheap to produce and comfortable to wear. By 2010, about half of our clothing was made from synthetic fibers. If you take a close look at a piece of synthetic clothes, you will see that the fabric is just tiny plastic strands woven together. And when you wash the clothes, the strands will be pulled loose, and the micro-fibers will fall out. Most of our washing machines do not have a filter, so everything, including the micro-fibers, is just flushed down the drain. The micro-fibers might move through a sewage treatment plant, which of course has a filter. But usually, the filter is just too large to stop the micro-fibers from passing through and being discharged into a nearby, let’s say, river or lake. So eventually the micro-fibers end up in the ocean. Although fiber loss goes down after a few washes, the sheer number of people wearing synthetic clothes and washing them simply adds up. As a result, there are currently 5 trillion pieces of micro-plastics floating around in our oceans. 

 

When the micro-plastics reach the oceans, they will be first consumed by plankton. And from there, they start to make their way up the food chain, and eventually reach us. Actually, a lot of the seafood we eat contain micro-plastics. So when we eat the seafood, the micro-plastics enter our bodies. I’m not exaggerating here. A study conducted in Austria recently has just proven that there are plastics in our bodies. The study involves stool samples, collected from eight countries around the world. The study found plastics in every single sample. To be more specific, the scientists identified a total of nine different kinds of plastics in the samples. So apparently this is an issue that we all need to take seriously, which leads to the question: What should we do about it?

 

First, it’s simply unrealistic for the entire industry to switch back to natural fibers because be them plant fibers like cotton or linen or animal fibers like wool or silk. Natural fibers are way more expensive than synthetic ones. What we can do is probably add a filter to our washing machines. But even such a filter can be very expensive. So the most feasible solution of all might just be buying less synthetic clothes and washing them less frequently. That is something that everyone can do. Thank you.
环保话题

【英中交传】232、北极二倍速变暖

【中英交传】218、星巴克纸吸管

【英中同传】209、新一代核能
【中英交传】181、气候变化的最后通牒
【中英交传】176、物联网的环境影响
【英中交传】171、反腐与气候变化
【中英交传】149、蜂蜜的残酷真相
【中英同传】138、看不见的垃圾处理厂
【英中同传】125、气候变化与人权
【中英交传】94、饮食西化加剧气候变化
【中英交传】75、边境墙与野生动物
【英中交传】69、防晒霜破坏海洋环境
【中英交传】61、墨西哥城口香糖大扫除
【中英交传】54、中国人吃入侵物种
【英中交传】46、小李子谈气候变化
【英中交传】39、如果全世界都吃素
【中英交传】32、臭氧层空洞
长文链接

【CI毕业考】两年厚积,三天薄发(上)

【CI毕业考】两年厚积,三天薄发(下)

【CI中期考】淘汰制,是否如传说般可怕?

【CI入学考】中国最难口译入学考

【Cora】我的口语学习经历(一年级)

【Cora】和大家说一点心里话

【Q&A;】第一波粉丝十问解答

【Q&A;】第二波粉丝十问解答



记得将“CI会议口译”设为星标哦

    已同步到看一看

    发送中

    本站仅按申请收录文章,版权归原作者所有
    如若侵权,请联系本站删除
    觉得不错,分享给更多人看到